|
|
Letters to the Editor
In the 1980’s I was going through a difficult patch, because I felt that
my life was not productive enough for the Lord and, faced with the knowledge
that life is short, I wanted to contribute more to the building of God’s
Kingdom while I had the opportunity.
As I prayed about this, and read the Bible, two verses kept coming to
me: Ezekiel 22:30 "And I sought for a man among them, that should . . . stand in the gap before me for the
land, that I should not destroy it", and Philippians 2:15 "That you
may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of
a crooked and perverse nation, among
whom you shine as lights in the world."
I had recently been reading ‘The God Who is There’ by Francis Schaeffer
and ‘Whose World?", and several of C.S.Lewis lesser known books. I wanted
to know how I could get the Christian message across to more people? I noticed
that Paul spent three months in public places: "Therefore disputed he in
the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him." Acts
The Bible tells us that if we are going to "strive" we must
"strive lawfully" (2Tim.2:5) so I set about finding the rules for
letter-writing. The newspaper itself spelled most of them out – word limit 250
words, no poetry, etc. I also soon learned that it always pays to preface
comments with "In my opinion . . ." or "I think that . . ."
and to avoid Bible quotations, dogmatism and unkind words. It does pay to quote
people, because for some strange reason people think a view is more important
if you say "So-and-so said:"
The problem which loomed largest was the fact that the gospel is called
"an offence" (Gal.511, 1Pet.2:8 but having said this we are also
told: 2 Corinthians 6:3 "Giving no offence in any thing, that the ministry
be not blamed." So presentation of gospel and Bible truth had to be done
with tact, discernment, warmth, and consideration, yet the gospel itself had to
be there in a pure form without ‘offending God’ by being an incompetent
messenger. This was quite a challenge! It was like trying to give sour, stinky
medicine to people who didn’t even know they were sick.
"Speaking the truth in love" (Eph.4:15) is not the easiest
thing to do, so many of my earliest letters to the editor were clumsy, and
rather blunt, but after a while I gradually learned how to speak to the subject
with a little more ‘aplomb and etiquette’. Like most things, practise makes
'perfect' - something I have yet to achieve!
Circulation of the newspaper in my area was about 37,000. Frequency of
my letters was usually one per week. Duration of writing those letters is now
22 years, which comes to approximately1,144 letters, but printed 37,000 times
for each letter gives us 814,000 letters, and multiplied by 52 weeks every year
produces a staggering 42 million letters. (42,328,000 to be precise)
I decided to ‘stand in the gap’ and try to present a Christian point of
view on various topical events and ideas as they came along. If there was
nothing particularly interesting going on I would either reword Christian
teaching or start some debate. Often these ‘irritation value’ letters provoked
wildly abusive responses, or crassly ignorant comments, but it all added to the
enjoyment, and I’m pretty sure most people who read these semi-illiterate
responses knew who was making the most sense.
I commend to you writing to the editor of YOUR local newspaper. Perhaps
you can see it as your ministry to your local community, for Jesus. If even one
letter from the Christian point of view is printed, who knows what a force for
good it may be in God’s hands? God can do mighty things with our small efforts.
The following letters are copied more or less straight from my
scrapbooks, in which I have kept all my little efforts over the years. I have
put them out in the public area not to ‘brag’, but to encourage you, the
reader, to put your own pen to paper and start writing for God too. You are
free to quote me, or base your own letters on my own.
God bless you as you too "stand in the gap"!
…………………………………………………
1984
First published
letter.
Dear sir, I have heard many hours of policy talk so far this past
fortnight, and there is no disputing that we need to know what a political
party intends to do in the practical, material and national areas.
What I have yet to hear is where any of the parties stand in regard to moral
and spiritual things. Are they for Jesus Christ or against Him? Are they for
the raising of Biblical moral standards, or against them?
Etc
For all and sundry
Dear sir, following an article published not long ago, in which I got
the impression that meals at the Oasis Recreation Centre were more for people
who were unable to afford good meals than for the general public, I have made
some enquiries.
I thought that if I bought a meal at the Oasis, I might be depriving
someone else of a good, very reasonably priced meal. Other people I have spoken
to about this also had the same thought.
The fact is the meals are for all and sundry, and the general public is
welcome to enjoy these well-prepared meals at
(The Oasis Recreation Centre was run by Christians, and I wanted to get
some free advertising in the paper for them.)
A fate far worse
Dear sir, The ‘Our World’ programme about nuclear war and its probably
effect was designed to cause viewers to think. What could be worse than an
entire planet rendered lifeless by radiation and dust storms and an ice age?
What indeed?
With due respect to the well-meaning folk who predict such things, may I
say that there is something far worse. It is, surely, an established fact that
all of us must at some time be born, and live for a short time, and ultimately,
die.
Ten out of ten people die, as does all life on the planet, as each
succeeding generation takes its place. But there was a man, not long ago, who
came back from the grave, and strode dynamically into the world, proclaiming
His power and authority over all things.
He also promised to raise all humans from their graves at some future
date, and judge them.
What could be worse than nuclear holocaust? I believe that to be judged
a sinner without a saviour, and to be sentenced to everlasting separation from
God’s presence, is far far worse.
Nuclear war may seem terrible, but death comes to us all, one way or
another, so why not lift our eyes and look further than the grave, and then put
our trust in the one who overcame it?
Who is to set the
standard?
Dear sir, in response to ‘analyst’ 31st March, who says that "the big change in
attitudes in our society today lies in the behaviour of the girls"?
‘Analyst’ would pin much on the raising of moral fibre among women. May I
enquire where is this moral tone to come from and who, or what standard of
morals these women are to set their levels by.
I believe, with due respect to the views of ‘analyst’ that there are at
least three ways of raising the moral tone of our society. All three stem
directly from a personal commitment to the person of Jesus Christ – the
creator, origin, and judge of all moral standards.
First, the Christian home. This can provide a great barrier against
wrecked lives, nurturing and training children in good living, and giving them
security that will remain with them for the rest of their lives.
Second, regular attendance of Bible teaching and preaching. The word of
God has changed untold millions of lives from a lifestyle of destruction to one
of joy and positive optimism.
Third, observance of the sabbath. Those who devote one day in seven to
the happy worship and prayerful remembrance of who God is, what He has done, is
doing, and will do, are refreshed continually. Young people benefit immensely
from this stabilising routine in their changing lives.
History is witness to the fact that it is better to put a fence at the
top of a hill, than to provide an ambulance at the bottom. A generation born
again by the power of Jesus Christ needs no ambulance.
Read all the Bible
Dear sir, the short answer to Mr Fountaine (18 May) is: "Please
read the whole Bible."
From his letter I see that he has made the usual mistake of confusing
true Christianity – the world’s greatest blessing – with false and spurious
copies.
Since Jesus Christ founded the one true religion (His claim, not mine),
misrepresation, misunderstanding and plagiarism has occcurred. Anyone can call
himself a Christian, and do anything in the name of Christ.
Mr Fountaine also equates the unChristlike behaviour of the Roman
Catholic crusaders, the confessionals, wars in
Mr Fountaine asks: "Why do Christians consider that they are the
only ones who are right?" Jesus did. E allowed no loopholes in His claims
for himself. Either He was the way, the truth and the life, or He was not. He
was also the one who thundered against hypocrisy . . .etc
Comfort in God’s Word
Dear sir, I am responding to all those parents who have, through a cot
death, suddenly lost a dear and precious child. I hope that what I say will be
a help and comfort to them as they cope with the reality of their loss.
For whatever natural reasons all life is given, sustained, and withdrawn
by our heavenly Father. If this is accepted as true, then the loss of one’s
child is no accident. We should remember also that that same Father, in
infinite love, watched His very own Son, His child, die on a cross. God knows
what it is like to see a child die, but He permits it because there is a
greater purpose behind it.
We on earth, limited by time, inexperience and the inability to fathom
anything beyond a certain point, must realise that God is not limited in any
way. He inhabits eternity. He understands everything. His nature is pure
wisdom, with love, and holiness. It is utterly impossible for Him to do anything
which is not motivated by pure love.
God tells us, in His word, to give Him thanks in and for all things. Can
yo thank God for taking the child He gave to you? If you can, it will help to
ckleanse away any bitterness which might be there.
Remember also that Jesus showed a great love for babies and young
children He enjoyed holding them in his arms. The gospels also record how Jesus
raised a young boy and a young girl back to life.
Finally, if you accept Jesus as your saviour – and thus unite with God,
you can be assured of a future reunion with your loved ones. This must be the
happiest word of comfort anyone could hear.
All for our own good.
Dear sir, "thankful" (28 April) asks me how can we give thanks
for the taking of life, except when it comes as a release from prolonged pain?
Please recall that the whole theme of my leter was this: we have a
loving heavenly Father, who lives behind all our reality. He is all-wise,
all-knowing, and absolutely in control of everything.
Now if you can accept this totally Biblical statement, you can see that
all life is not only given from Him, but also sustained and withdrawn by Him.
Also . . . he is not obliged to explain anything to us. We can be
thankful, in a general sense, for everything, because He means, ultimately,
everything for our good. "Thankful" says that when
"ultimately" death occurs . . . we ought to say, "Thy will be
done." I agree, in part, but would add: "Thank you Father that thy
will, and not mine, is being done." I hope "Thankful" sees that
I was only trying to bring comfort to someone by presenting the Bible’s
teaching and not my own opinions."
Dear sir, I am very much in favour of having a street mall in Timaru,
for a number of reasons . . .etc
Teach morality as
well.
Dear sir, regarding the teaching of sex education in schools, may I off
a few thoughts to those involved.
To all parents, please do not allow anyone to teach your children simply
the mechanisms of sex, mating and reproduction, without also instructing them
on the moral and spiritual areas, which are always involved. The desire to pair
off with the opposite gender is strong in most healthy people, and without the
moral and spiritual restraint, sex can become cheap, trivial, debased and a
short-lived thrill, which can spoil the fulness of marriage.
To all young people please do not follow the well-worn path to
emotional, spritual and often physical ruin, which so many of your age have
followed. Do not disregard the fact that everything we do has repercussions in
every area of our and other people’s lives. Sometimes we reap what we sow years
afterwards, and sometimes for the rest of our lives.
There is nothing new about my opinion . . . . the Bible says that sex is
only part of our make-up, and in order to enjoy sex, and stay happy, we ought
to follow the instructions of God . . . etc.
A suggestion of
evolution.
Dear sir, the Herald carried two items that caught my eye. One was about
the possible formation of a solar system some 50 light years from our planet,
and the other was the question as to whether NZ would survive a nuclear war.
He two items seemed to be linked in that both suggested evolution –
another planet like our own forming, the development of life, evolution from
singe cells to monkeys and their relations, mankind, nuclear war and the
result: total extinction.
If one believes in evolution as the basic theme of totally unguided,
randomly occuring events, working on material which comes from nowhere, and
goes to nowhere, why is there so much compassion shown about the preservation
of mankind? Surely it it is not motivated merely by the fear of dying? If we
are, as many evolutionists claim, just an accidental life-form, made of
‘mindless’ atoms and molecules, that just happened to become organised for a brief
moment of time, why should anyone care about anything?
Such things as world famine, loneliness, poverty, pollution and so on,
are of no lasting consequence at all. Death reigns supreme.
These questions are worth considering, if you are an evolutionist. The
only alternative to evolution is Jesus Christ, creation, and the Bible; the
only viable alternative that is.
Get on knees first.
Dear sir, the Herald’s "Hawkeye" cartoon (19 Oct) pictured the
rime Minister as Moses, leading
First, it was God, not Moses, who led His people out of the bondage of
Egyptian slavery. Moses was only the instrument.
Second, the promised land had to be conquered through warfare, thus
destroying the wicked Canaanites, for whom judgement was long overdue.
Third, if Lange is a modern-day Moses, his Labour government must also
be committed to the Lord Jesus Christ and call NZ to repentance, because
without a spiritual renewal NZ will not be any different this year, next year,
or any other year. No policy by any government can change the fact that human
beings are basically slaves to sin, and no leader on earth can alter that fact.
The Lange Moses is leading people from the slavery of
If we really want to leave the
Evolution wrong.
Dear sir, Richard Leakey declared recently that he had found "the
most complete skeleton of an early human ancestor". He dated the bones at
1.6 million years old.
I acknowledge this man’s experience, knowledge and sincerity, and do not
pretend to be on the same footing as far as his training is concerned, but I
would like to propose an alternatinve view.
About 7000 years ago God created this planet, and covered the land areas
with plants and animals. Each separate and special creature and plant continued
to reproduce after its kind, held tightly by the genetic code within its cells.
Mankind, male and female, was also created.
The Genesis account describes how and why sin, which is rebellion
against God, came to earth, and the consequences. Following the judgement on
Mankind and all creation, a further judgement was necessary – the Great Flood.
This global submersion of the planet buried all the civilisations, plants and
land animals existing at the time.
The evidence is obvious – our fossil fuels, massive limestone outcrops,
vast sedimentary deposits, inland dry lakes and of course the billions of tons
of bones buried in the sedimentary rocks all round the world.
Richard leakey assumes that the bones he has found belong to an ancestor
1.6 million years ago. It could be, though, that they come from a human, only a
few thousand years distant, or, they may simply be the bones of a primate.
There can be no ‘missing link’ if the Bible is taken into account, but
there can be anything at all if the speculative assumptions of the evolutionist
are used. It is either one or the other, but cannot be both.
Homosexuality.
Dear sir, was Jesus a homosexual? Of course not. Should the coming TV
documentary, which alleges that he was be screened without protest from
Christians? Of course not.
. . . .it is blasphemous to suggest that the Son of God would ever
practise a sinful activity that he himself said would bar a person from
entering God’s kingdom. Also, homosexuality is part of the sinful nature of
fallen Mankind, and if Jesus was sinful in any way, he could never have been
the perfect sacrifice for our sins. He would have given his life for us in
vain. Etc.
Two theories opposed.
Dear sir, in reply to Mrs Sleigh, I do not, as she says, imply for a
moment that biblical creation contradicts
When the general impression and the detailed berse by verse account of
Genesis chapter one is compared with the theory of evolution, there is no
agreement. The two views cannot be made one. They are completely and utterly
opposed.
As Mrs Sleigh said, faith in Jesus Christ determines salvation, but that
is a separate issue. My letters, which she referred to, were aimed at the
faulty reasons underlying evolutionist theories. The general theory of organic
evolution says that all living things have arisen by a materialistic,
naturalistic process, which began with non-organic materials.
The creation account records the fact that all basic animal and plant
types, the created "kinds", were brought into existence by acts of
God, using special processes which are not operating today.
As to carbon dating, it is based on assumptions, not facts.
Radiochronologists assume millions and millions of years before they even
start, so all their instruments are adjusted to suit. I am not a scientist, but
I know this method is basically dishonest. By way of illustration, look at the
time Jesus created wine. If a scientist had dated the wine he might have given
it three months. When the earth is dated, the same problem arises. God created
the earth, fully constructed and finished, then he judged it with a global
flood. Today, the rocks are assumed to be very old, along with the bones of the
animals buried in them, because of the assumption inherent in the mind of the
scientist. Etc.
Bible is full of
facts.
Dear sir, Mr. Fountaine recently wrote: "Self-confessed Christians
should get their heads out of the sand and let their brains see the light.
Unquestioning and blind faith do not make a belief a fact." I heartily
agree.
With respect the dictionary says: "a fact is a thing that is known
to be true." This means that for faith to be worthwhile it must be based
on something true, otherwise it is only faith in faith, or faith in nothing.
Here is where Christianity, which is based on the Bible, really shines. The
Bible is fact-filled, and it is factual, not only because it claims to be so,
but also because it is verifiable by external examination. The Bible is
self-authenticating.
The gospels provide a wealth of details. The life and times of Jesus are
objectively and selectively given. The narrative is carefully objective, and
truthful, logical and reasonable.
The remainder of the new Testament is a collection of many themes, all
laid out carefully, reasoned and argued with logical progression.
Mr Fountaine rightly criticises "unquestioning and blind
faith". It was to prevent such worthless faith that God gave to us the
evidence, truth, and facts, all collated into the book we call the Bible. Etc.
Ethiopians must
believe.
Dear sir, the disastrous famine currently devastating
I have grown up in the wonderfully blessed
So how can disasters such as the Ethiopian one be averted, in the long
term?
I believe it is possible to understand the how and why of famine by
examining the root causes . . . Etc . . . as a national model, God dealt with
Israel as if to show other nations, and us, how their welfare was directly
related to their response to Him. When
When I look at countries such as
Etc.
Question of belief
Dear sir, Mr Dunn has not read my leters carefully. If he had, he would
not have said he thinks I am "bent on depriving society of the opportunity
of watching ‘Jesus – the Evidence’"
It is not my wish to oppose my beliefs on others. The example of Jesus
Himself ought to illustrate this, in that, while he held up God’s Word,
preached it, taught it, stayed faithful to it, died according to it, yet not
once did he ever try to force people to follow him.
……………………………………….
The above letters were some of the very first I wrote. Looking back at
them now I see areas where they could have been improved, but the Christian
viewpoint is unmistakable. Over the years I have been complimented repeatedly
by friend and ‘foe’ on these letters, and many readers of the newspaper, I am
told, look out for them eagerly. I have been to two special meetings at the
Timaru Herald, to meet other regular writers, and have become in a miniscule
way, a sort of celebrity – simply because I stuck to the job! I have written
through at least three editor’s and will probably keep going for many more
years. One other aspect of this is the fact that all newspapers are archived,
so historians may one day sort through past letters as part of their studies.
The letters are also a weekly item of encouragement for other Christians, and
sometimes they may help Christians formulate a biblically-based opinion on some
topic they hadn’t considered before.
I have also written to other newspapers, and the TV Guide and several
other publications. It seems that in a democratic society there is a great deal
of freedom to express one’s point of view – as long as it is done in the right
way.Even better to express the view with consideration and tact.
More recent letters, around the year 2006, include the following:
Walking with
Dinosaurs
Dear sir, he BBC program 'Walking with Dinosaurs' claimed that dinosaurs
lived during what is termed the Jurassic period. This interesting name comes
from the Dura mountains, which run along the French-Swiss frontier, in which
certain fossils have been found in the sedimentary rocks of that region.
But the manner in which the fossils are dated is a case of circular
reasoning, because the age of the rocks is estimated by the fossils they
contain, and the age of the fossils is estimated by the type of rock in which
the fossils are entombed. The fossils date the rocks I and the rocks date the
fossils.
How do paleontologists date the fossils? By using the theory of
evolution, which presumes that life evolved millions of years ago and gradually
ascended in complexity (through mutations and natural selection) to the highly
complex degree of today. But the fossils show no such progression. With the
total absence of transitional forms, the entire so-called evidence for
evolution entirely collapses, thus the Jurassic period is all part of the same
'castle in the air' theory.
Mutations are usually harmful and detrimental to organisms, and natural
selection simply weeds out the weaker individuals, and never adds any new
genetic information Therefore. it is foolishness to date a layer of rock by the
fossils it contains.
What fossils in sedimentary rock do show is sudden, rapid burial, before
decomposition takes place, of living organisms such as plants and animals. The
process is clear, but the age of the rocks or fossils cannot be determined by
circular reasoning.
Cartoon
Dear sir, the recent Islamic protests over publication of a caricature
of their prophet has raised some interesting questions about freedom of
expression, sensitivity to other people’s beliefs and individual choice. There
is no simple answer but, as I see it, at the heart of the situation are two
prophets.
One of these prophets has made the Arab east what it is today, and the
other prophet has helped make the west what it is today. The interesting thing
is how we Westerners treat the prophet of the west?
Here in the free western world the person of Jesus is ridiculed,
satirised, caricatured and mocked. His name is used as a swear word, and he is
pictured in a wide range of styles; comic, modern and Victorian. In every
picture Bible he is depicted as a different man, and there is no end to the
number of books which criticise, minimalise and subvert his teachings. Despite
2000 years of open attack, Jesus survives and thrives. Currently he has about 2
billion followers, and as far as I know they have never had angry, destructive
fits over criticism of their leader.
One of the goals of radical Islamic forces is to bring about a political
system based on Sharia law, which is utterly opposed to reason, science and
freedom. The prophet of the east would have imposed this on the west already,
were it not for the western prophet’s influence, yet here in the west we
continue to ignore, at least nationally, his words. If Islam takes over, it
will be because the west has finally abandoned their prophet.
Hamas
Recently the future of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process took an
unexpected turn. About a week ago the Palestinians held their long-awaited
parliamentary elections, and amazingly, the terrorist group Hamas was handed a
landslide victory. According to the newspaper, Hamas is believed to have killed
more than 500 people in 350 separate terrorist attacks since 1993.
I did a quick search of the Internet and found an interview with Hamas
leader Mahmoud Al-Zahar, which aired last week on Al-Manar TV, in which he
said:
"We will not
give up the resistance against the Israeli enemy, which ultimately led to its
withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank...Palestine means
Palestine in its entirety - from the (Mediterranean) Sea to the (Jordan) River,
from Ras Al-Naqura to Rafah. We cannot give up a single inch of it. Therefore,
we will not recognize the Israeli enemy's right to a single inch...we can found
a state on any piece of the land, and this will not mean we give up on any
other part of the land...we must not pass on to our sons a disgraceful defeat
by recognizing the Israeli enemy's right to exist, where it has no such
right."
No wonder
Noah’s
Dear sir, there is a very interesting window display in Timaru at the
moment, down the south end of town. It depicts the Biblical proportions of
Noah’s
The window display gives reasonably accurate measurements for the
length, breath and height of the
The enormous size of the
Surrounding the display are many scientific and geological facts that
directly and indirectly support the Biblical narrative. Many other world
cultures tell a similar story of a worldwide flood and a few survivors from a
boat. Despite all the evidence, there are still scientists today who deny the
possibility that Earth was ever completely inundated, yet they claim that Mars,
which has almost no water, once was! How odd to claim the bible story is wrong,
when the Earth is already three-quarters covered in ocean.
Section 59.
Dear sir, regarding the proposed repeal of section 59 of the Crimes Act
I would like to point out that it is already a crime in New Zealand to
physically abuse a child; this is called assault and is a criminal offence.
Section 59 does not authorise assault on children, it only provides a
justification to parents where the force used is reasonable and is used for the
purposes of correction. There is a difference between abuse and correction.
Section 59 does not allow abuse, it only allows correction. Abuse is criminal.
Section 2 of the Crimes Act defines assault as: "the act of intentionally
applying or attempting to apply force to the person of another, directly or
indirectly, or threatening by any act or gesture to apply such force to the
person of another . . ."
What many people don’t seem to understand is that most smacking will fit
the definition of assault as defined in section 194 of the Crimes Act 1961 and
therefore be illegal.
Technically, if a parent smacks their child, they will be committing an
assault, but section 59 currently provides a defence to this, so long as the
force used by the parent is reasonable in the circumstances and is used for the
purposes of correction.
If section 59 is repealed, parents would not have this defence and, as a
result, any parent who intentionally applies appropriate corrective force to
their child could be found guilty of the crime of assault!
The Office of the Police Commissioner has confirmed that most smacking
would be considered an assault so what are good, sensible, loving parents going
to do – abandon their parenting to the State? Give up their relationship to
their children? There must be a better way to curtail genuine abuse than to
penalise good parents. I am totally against the repeal of Section 59.
……………………………………………………….
These few examples give an idea of the sort of thing an editor is
willing to publish. We hope that this essay will encourage you to put pen to
paper and add your Christian point of view to publications which are open to
other points of view.
…………………………………………….
Final notes.
Some other topics I have written on:
Birth defects and DNA as it relates to creation and the Fall, the movie
‘Deep Impact’, education and ideology, Radiohead and the lyrics they sing, old.
Preserved headsreturned to maori, the World Cup soccer games, many book
reviews, Te Papa, why people are leaving church buildings, liberals and their
poisonous views, evolution – many on this topic, Halloween, smacking of
children and correct discipline, NZ defence force, star theory, the age of the
oceans, movie reviews – many of these, nudist colonies, disabled people,
reincarnation, avalanches and daredevils, a religious study, creationism and
intelligent design – many on these topics, our solar system, buzz words, the
Simpsons, politics, familes, ape rights, the Wizard and real wizards, art,
Nostradamus, South Park, drinking age, billboards, East Timor, Pentecostalism
gone mad, forgeries, New Zealand, leader’s debate, spider’s thread, the
millenium, human behaviour, life forms, Christmas and the true Bible Christmas
story, the moon, religion and Christianity, the sun, US shootings, our
universe, biology, dinosaurs, mammoths, the 60 minutes TV program, freedom of
speech and license to be rude, Family Guy and its callousness, marriage,
Easter, racism, video bans, AIDS, smoking, HarryPotter, property rights, Mark
Todd, fossil frauds, letter boxes, robots, global flood, home schooling, sex
pledges, abortion, sex education, the new Year, saving forests,truth, Mark
Middleton, the death penalty, environmental concerns,cloning of humans, the
human genome, Hollywood, self-images, China and the US, what a hero really is,
Teletubbies and other good programs, Jesus,, Christian ethics,historic scrolls,
the Bible,Noah’s Ark, terrorists, GM food, human embryos, the Iron Age, Justice
Fisher,Advertising, television, hate crimes, war movies, totalitarioan rule,
prisons, the Dalai Llama, Shakespeare, rights, beauty, the Honour code,
gambling, Elvis, September 11th, the Feminist movement, parenting,
Fundamentalism, a porn movie, NCEA, animal rights, the good life, polarice
melt, the Boy Scouts and zero tolerance, China, Superman, futility of care for
the aged or infirm, euthanasia, reality TV, the Da Vinci Code, the Muslim
faith,our Earth, infanticide, the Treaty ofWaitangi, the flatulent tax and Mel
Gibson’s film ‘The Passion’, to name but a few.
There is seemingly no limit to the range of topics available to be
written about, but it usually pays to focus on some contemporary event and add
the Christian view to that. Editors like immediacy and relevance. They are
smart people, with a good eye for an interesting item.
Good luck.